Dell OptiPlex 9020

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9020  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 21:06
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 284
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 05A4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 500GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52020100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 442
Mixed 393
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 303
236% 324 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Generic External 240GB
130GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 40 42 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 40.7
Write 41.4
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 40
55% 40 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 8.9
520% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 029E CM3X2G1333C9 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 GBT2708 G27F
Typical OptiPlex 9020 Builds (Compare 10,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback