HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 845A
Memory17.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 19:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 584
57% 466 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 512GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 22 296 543 21 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 1,293
Write 870
Mixed 791
SusWrite 228
176% 795 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 3.7
64% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 34.8
55% 112 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 187%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 13 32 0" 1280 720
Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA) Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback