HP ENVY TE01-3xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics6.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP ENVY TE01-3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89B5
Memory0.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 193
2-Core 381
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 741
8-Core 1,329
124% 1035 Pts
64-Core 2,200
136% 2,200 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 107%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
HP(103C 89B5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 10.1
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 0.1
5% 6.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 505 436 436 436 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,576
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 498
286% 1,274 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 65.8
279% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 1,301
DQ Mixed 997
828% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 235%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S1MR-4 HP32D4U2S8MR-8 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.2% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 20.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 22
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical ENVY TE01-3xxx Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback