HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8934
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 09:01
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 644
71% 560 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8934) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 27.9
17% 22.9 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC711 HFS512GDE9X073N 512GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,426
Write 1,934
Mixed 1,636
444% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 66.1
240% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1029
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 932
686% 906 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 318%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 29.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 28.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 16" 1536 793 BOE08F6
Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx Builds (Compare 2,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback