MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 08:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$161
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 276
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 893
81% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,548
96% 1,548 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 231B) 3GB
CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 5.5
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 50 500GB
241GB free
Firmware: 10WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 318 277 283 295 286 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1597
Write 1,493
Mixed 896
SusWrite 355
242% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 67.6
244% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,444
DQ Write 1308
DQ Mixed 1,075
889% 1,276 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 222%
Great: 258%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 42 49 48 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 57.2
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 45.8
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 34%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
422GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 33
Write 34.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 38.1
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF4G64AZ-3G2F1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 34.4
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 29.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 103%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.6" 1280 720 GSM56FE W2243
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $993
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback