HP 500-246

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 500-246  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 99.9
43% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 144
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 44.9
28% 38.7 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 25.8
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 172
Mixed 321
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 27.3
110% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 176
144% 206 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: HP34
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 143
Mixed 91.2
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
111GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 47.4
Mixed 62.5
84% 75 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
98% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 14
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 20 30 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7765 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical 500-246 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback