Lenovo 20FAS0T300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FAS0T300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS0T300
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 20:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 56
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 91.7
42% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 133
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 8.2
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 441 631 601 330 196 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
68% Good
Read 564
Write 496
Mixed 556
SusWrite 448
116% 516 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 14.5
49% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 61.9
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 58.7
45% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 68%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA266.M8FF 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 45 0 14" 1280 720 LEN40A9
Typical 20FAS0T300 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FAS0T300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback