Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 19:46
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 216
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 335
46% 343 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3A2E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20240001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,061
Write 1114
Mixed 951
233% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 46.8
153% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 702
496% 624 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 161 14 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback