Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 18:36
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 409
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.4
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 396 311 5.8 5.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 493
Write 385
Mixed 383
SusWrite 187
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 25.3
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 35.4
86% 175 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
394GB free
Firmware: M0CR050
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 233 235 232 235 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 247
Write 232
Mixed 200
SusWrite 233
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 22
86% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 190
141% 185 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
748GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 89
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 113
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 114%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
214GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 109 111 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 110
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN381F HP P24v G5
Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback