Intel P55/H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel P55/H55  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 17:44
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 158
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 370
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36B9) 2GB
CLim: 1542 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 43.1
36% 45 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 38.1
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 60GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0822A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 242
Write 208
Mixed 202
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 21.4
87% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 21.8
50% 101 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 75%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
14GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 157 145 149 151 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 218
Write 192
Mixed 184
SusWrite 141
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 25.1
84% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 163
125% 170 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2481 VA24DQLB
Typical P55/H55 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel P55/H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback