Intel X99H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Intel X99
Motherboard	Intel X99H (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 14:46
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 3,953 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 150 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 576 51% 432 Pts	64-Core 1,159 72% 1,159 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 8C94) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.2% Above average	Lighting 70.6 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 69 58% 71.8 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 68.3 56% 69 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Q2000mn 256G 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0513A0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 1,756 Write 1,419 Mixed 1,153 320% 1,443 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 29 190% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 620 DQ Mixed 296 266% 390 MB/s
Poor: 183% Great: 204%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 189 Write 151 Mixed 90 106% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 71GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 75.2 Write 48.2 Mixed 48.6 43% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 22.5 Write 4.8 Mixed 4.7 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1A1 2x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 24 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.2% Good	MC Read 30 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 23.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	51	60	17"	1280 720	GSM4B3E L1953S

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

CPU
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	337x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	183x
Xeon E5-2650 v4IntelBench 66%, 1,056 samples	100x

GPU
RX 580-2048SPAMDBench 41%, 38,816 samples	99x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	86x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	25x

RAM
atermiter 1x16GBUnknownBench 36%, 988 samples	151x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 604 samples	108x
DDR4 8GB 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 57%, 462 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16