Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results


Gaming 234% UFO	Desktop 113% UFO	Workstation 278% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

System	Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer SO690
Memory	24.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display	3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 11:34
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13950HX 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 116% U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Memory 75 1-Core 214 2-Core 414 121% 235 Pts	4-Core 776 8-Core 1,294 126% 1,035 Pts	64-Core 2920 181% 2920 Pts
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 121%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop) 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 207% Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	219% Outstanding	Lighting 307 Reflection 352 Parallax 341 250% 333 fps	MRender 444 Gravity 277 Splatting 214 244% 312 fps
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 244%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 831GB free (System drive) Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1744 1942 1922 1604 1759 1871 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,728 Write 1,442 Mixed 1,460 SusWrite 1807 363% 1,609 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 46.6 153% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 995 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 760 539% 704 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 427%
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 765GB free Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1501 1785 1846 1590 1542 1720 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,328 Write 173 Mixed 844 SusWrite 1664 224% 1,002 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 51.5 162% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 719 520% 690 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 427%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	MC Read 71.4 MC Write 61.7 MC Mixed 63.4 187% 65.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 48.1 SC Mixed 26.8 91% 31.7 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 179%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	51	27	60	16"	1280 720	AUO8EA6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 109%

UFO

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

CPU
Core i9-13950HXIntelBench 116%, 1,063 samples	167x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples	49x
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples	48x
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples	40x

SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	97x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	23x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	13x

RAM
HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,113 samples	51x
M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 149%, 2,547 samples	39x
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 152%, 5,144 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16