Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 02:11
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 627
71% 556 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 124
Parallax 110
88% 114 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 121
Splatting 108
87% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 330 328 330 329 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,228
Write 1,017
Mixed 632
SusWrite 357
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 56.1
185% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 849
649% 885 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 169%
Great: 236%
Sandisk SD8TN8U256G2000 256GB
98GB free
Firmware: X4161100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 230 198 197 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 453
Write 303
Mixed 227
SusWrite 203
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 32.8
126% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 174
159% 246 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
906GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 179 181 180 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 170
Mixed 107
SusWrite 179
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus Thin 7200 2.5" 320GB-$29
297GB free
Firmware: 0005DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
65% Good
Read 112
Write 86.4
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 115
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 65%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4
Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,022
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback