Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230904
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 193 68% 121 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 330 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 39.4 31% 39.9 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 28.4 28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,234 Write 885 Mixed 912 224% 1,010 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 57 188% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 483 DQ Write 408 DQ Mixed 522 370% 471 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%
takeMS colorline 8GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 27.8 Write 4.7 Mixed 7.7 13% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905702-022.A00G 1x8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 12.2 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC0CF PHL 223V5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,314x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,012x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	958x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	746x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	719x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	296x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16