Lenovo 11JQS46300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 11JQS46300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 32E4
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 00:28
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 320
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 857
93% 736 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 32E4) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.40.58.06
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 27
15% 20.7 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 21.2
15% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BL7 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,800
Write 1,915
Mixed 1,479
387% 1,731 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.6
227% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 902
678% 912 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 338%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
214GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 382
Write 418
Mixed 386
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 45.5
155% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 52.8
93% 182 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 12% 72 215 60 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM5AFB LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback