Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 280%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics268% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive455% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory48.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230815
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 20:56
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 179
2-Core 346
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,090
108% 880 Pts
64-Core 1568
97% 1568 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Asus(1043 0506) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
268% Outstanding
Lighting 354
Reflection 461
Parallax 775
288% 530 fps
MRender 510
Gravity 297
Splatting 466
350% 424 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 268%
Great: 293%
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 13.9
6% 12.1 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 22.2
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3839 3836 3309 2445 2213 2062 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 2,779
Write 3,112
Mixed 2,910
SusWrite 2,951
664% 2,938 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 101
318% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,587
DQ Write 1,286
DQ Mixed 1,407
1,062% 1,427 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 455%
Great: 633%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 264 263 262 264 262 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 225
Write 261
Mixed 184
SusWrite 262
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 0.1
86% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
3% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB
24GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 149 146 149 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 92
Write 134
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 149
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
278% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 82.1
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 70.3
211% 73.8 GB/s
SC Read 55.5
SC Write 67.7
SC Mixed 56.6
171% 59.9 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 199%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 28.6" 1280 720 SAM7177 LS28AG700N
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback