Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 166
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 121
21% 150 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12044.3
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 75.8
44% 62.4 fps
MRender 57.7
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 42.8
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zadak TWSS3 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025O
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 85.4
Write 111
Mixed 132
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 9.7
21% 7.13 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 115
85% 109 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 89%
SSD TGT Seal ST 240GB
54GB free
Firmware: FW200929
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 327 214 347 320 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 279
Write 286
Mixed 243
SusWrite 282
62% 272 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 3.3
40% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 84.6
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 13.3
51% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL22-22-22 D4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 14.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 14 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical PRIME A320M-K/BR Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback