American XU133SR200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmerican XU133SR200  (all builds)
MotherboardAmerican XU133SR200
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 16:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6560U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 130
52% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 206
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vaseky v900/512G 512GB
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2005XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 51 59 59 2.5 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 575
Write 29.6
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 37.6
35% 165 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 5.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 146
28% 146 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 39 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0792
Typical XU133SR200 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: American XU133SR200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback