Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140110
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 41
2-Core 94.8
42% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 130
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
8.44% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 14.1
8% 9.43 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.44%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TSSD230S 1TB
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 91 99 100 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 156
Write 165
Mixed 152
SusWrite 95.9
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25.7
87% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 69
DQ Mixed 46
37% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
263GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 93 99 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 97.3
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 24.8
161% 24.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 30 60 18.1" 1280 720 DELA003 DELL 2000FP
Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback