Micro UM480XT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro UM480XT  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F6BFC
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 07:18
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 779
81% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 723 717 479 475 480 480 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 1,598
Mixed 1,256
SusWrite 559
282% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 56.2
179% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 399
394% 638 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 189%
Great: 311%
Samsung MZ7LH1T9HMLT-00003 2TB
320GB free
Firmware: HXT76F3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 242 271 253 264 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 474
Write 223
Mixed 405
SusWrite 248
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 40.7
115% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 140
141% 226 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-120.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 28.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 32 0" 1280 720
Typical UM480XT Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Micro UM480XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback