Asus N76VZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAsus N76VZ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N76VZ
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 04:05
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 71
2-Core 125
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 176
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Asus(1043 2103) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 7.3
6% 8 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 381
Write 225
Mixed 214
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 17.7
65% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 120
104% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
16GB free
Firmware: 0303
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.9
Write 26.9
Mixed 24.9
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 38%
SD Card 1GB
0GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.5
8% 6.73 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 17.2" 1600 900 AUO129E
Typical N76VZ Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N76VZ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback