Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 23:15
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 190
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 419
47% 367 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1334) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4617
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 51.7
Parallax 42.2
42% 48.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37.3
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 488 191 67 77 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 568
Write 632
Mixed 182
SusWrite 232
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 27.1
62% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 498
391% 544 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 157%
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
790GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 802 794 838 847 848 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,063
Write 1,520
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 910
260% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 41.4
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 537
419% 580 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 168%
Great: 274%
PNY CS900 120GB SSD
220GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 448 288 180 176 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 417
Write 353
Mixed 330
SusWrite 277
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 27.7
104% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 225
191% 279 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.5
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0856
Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback