HP 810-230qe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP 810-230qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 22:52
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 509
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1059 MHz, MLim: 540 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 10.2
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 13
Splatting 13.3
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP M700 240GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1024A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 57 76 62 74 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 428
Write 360
Mixed 373
SusWrite 111
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 13.5
71% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 13.8
41% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 191 195 196 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 150
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 194
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 0515 CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 127 9 60 21.5" 1920 1057 ACI22C1 VX228
Typical 810-230qe Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-230qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback