bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime71 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 139
49% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 318
38% 291 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disque virtuel Microsoft 184GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,020
Write 1,151
Mixed 1,066
242% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 19.2
57% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 437
364% 531 MB/s
Disque virtuel Microsoft 376GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,073
Write 772
Mixed 818
197% 888 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 18
57% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 536
428% 607 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3968, 4224 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 63.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 39.5
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 5 0 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback