| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 16 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Amazon g4dn.xlarge (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Amazon |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171016 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 24 '23 at 20:32 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
46.1%
Average
|
51% 86 Pts
|
24% 183 Pts
|
12% 196 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
73.8%
Very good
|
70% 99.2 fps
|
81% 99.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 161GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 84 92 91 145 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
|
27.8%
Poor
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
33% 123 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 61 | 40 | 60 | 23.9" | 1280 720 | UNK0000 |
Typical g4dn.xlarge Builds (Compare 20 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Amazon g4dn.xlarge
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |