Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-E  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 16:50
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 298
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 957
96% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 116
Parallax 122
104% 122 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 84.3
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 825 439 601 699 711 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
78GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 101 101 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 168
Write 51
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 100
74% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
256GB free
Firmware: PB3OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 59
Write 30.7
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 36.2
27% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4W.M8FE1 BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1009 ACI22E5 VX229
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-E Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback