Lenovo 81WF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81WF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 16:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 507
58% 455 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Legend(17AA 3FB5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 7.3
6% 6.73 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZNT256G TOS 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 796 849 403 397 404 333 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 764
Write 978
Mixed 1,044
SusWrite 530
188% 829 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 60.6
211% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 393
394% 640 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 17.3" 1600 877 BOE08E4
Typical 81WF Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback