MSI Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI (MS-7D93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D93
MotherboardMSI Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI (MS-7D93)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 16:20
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 167
2-Core 326
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 951
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,196
74% 1,196 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 190
Parallax 185
130% 178 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 170
Splatting 125
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 130 128 127 126 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 431
Write 414
Mixed 346
SusWrite 153
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 38.8
136% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 324
231% 298 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 124%
Viathan N001T4V-1TB 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: H230509a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2848 2924 2927 2445 1317 1379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 3,498
Write 2,767
Mixed 2,018
SusWrite 2,306
592% 2,647 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 59.9
208% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 368
384% 667 MB/s
Poor: 320%
This bench: 381%
Great: 389%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 50 49 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
3TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 387 384 398 391 395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 402
Mixed 382
SusWrite 390
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 38
135% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 259
191% 258 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
119GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 319 314 322 317 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 426
Write 381
Mixed 348
SusWrite 326
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 37.4
130% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 246
182% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 6000 C36 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 48.8
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 26
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 132%
Great: 205%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F32 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI (MS-7D93) Builds (Compare 845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z790 GAMING PRO WIFI (MS-7D93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback