Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 14:04
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 140
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 355
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 30.8
18% 26.4 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1124A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 262 266 266 266 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 481
Write 420
Mixed 404
SusWrite 253
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 25
132% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 36.5
71% 140 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 99%
Nvme Apacer AS2280Q4 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: SN07443 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 461 466 471 470 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
163% Outstanding
Read 1,158
Write 1034
Mixed 1,052
SusWrite 470
208% 928 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.7
218% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 487
354% 462 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 163%
Great: 360%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
162GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 264 268 270 268 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 436
Mixed 419
SusWrite 268
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 46.3
151% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 204
164% 231 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 125%
Apacer AS350 1TB
644GB free
Firmware: AP615PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 270 275 276 277 291 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2400C11 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 14.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 33.1" 1280 720 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback