Asrockrack EP2C621D12 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsrockrack EP2C621D12 WS  (all builds)
Memory373.1 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 193
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 770
67% 574 Pts
64-Core 2,554
158% 2,554 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mz7lh480 HAHQ-000V3 01P 480GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 380 379 377 349 303 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.5% Good
Read 389
Write 382
Mixed 356
SusWrite 361
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 22.9
74% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 118
84% 110 MB/s
Samsung MZPLJ1T6HBJR-00007 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EPK9CB5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2426 2431 2433 2436 2429 2432 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,142
Write 2,151
Mixed 1,332
SusWrite 2,431
402% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 55.1
191% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,165
DQ Write 948
DQ Mixed 1,151
836% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 300%
Great: 386%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK 287GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 32.3
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 64 0" 1024 705
Typical EP2C621D12 WS Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrockrack EP2C621D12 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback