QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	9.21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '23 at 12:12
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11700 6 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 44.6 2-Core 198 48% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 270 34% 259 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 75GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 89 109 77 59 59 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.21% Terrible	Read 85.2 Write 75.2 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 84 17% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 2% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 9.21% Great: 64%
Qemu HARDDISK 27GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4GB free Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 53.4 Write 82.5 Mixed 43.9 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 117% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 56%
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 16GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 54 44 37 65 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 12.7 Write 45.5 Mixed 50 SusWrite 46.1 29% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x6GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1 of 1 slots used 6GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 24.8 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14.1 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	18	13	32	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16