ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1772

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star GS70 2PC Stealth
Motherboard	MSI MS-1772 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140128
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '18 at 17:46
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.1 2-Core 187 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 504 51% 413 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M 18,736 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 1104) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 27.2 17% 23.4 fps	MRender 21.6 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 mSATA 128GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUXA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7465 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2558 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1054 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 171 171 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 143 (C2) HDA temperature 61 42 249109151783 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	69.7% Good	Read 513 Write 301 Mixed 188 73% 334 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 60.6 4K Mixed 19.1 77% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 312 DQ Mixed 198 144% 177 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 94%
CT240BX2 00SSD1 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 168GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 41.2 Write 40.8 Mixed 40.8 53% 41 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 9.06 982% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 9.43 1,007% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-1772 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1772

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	101x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	39x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	11x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	107x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples	25x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	24x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	44x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	25x
RBU-SMS100S3128GD 128GBKingstonBench 63%, 481 samples	9x

RAM
MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,392 samples	37x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 2x8GBAdataBench 52%, 1,843 samples	30x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback