Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FL
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '23 at 01:39
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 122 52% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 30.9 8-Core 311 16% 171 Pts	64-Core 48.2 3% 48.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 11BF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.64% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.64% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 214 187 160 150 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 757 Write 821 Mixed 836 SusWrite 197 147% 653 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 25.8 90% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 38.2 DQ Mixed 123 101% 153 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 187%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 341GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 115 113 112 110 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 70.1 Write 70 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 112 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 017A D23.22240H.001 16GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 20.2 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 3.6 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	44	17	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO21ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FL_X509FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	33x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	32x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	46x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	22x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	15x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	29x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	10x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 486 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16