HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 21:10
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 167
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 387
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 35.1
30% 37.3 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 35
Splatting 37.4
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 442 450 461 470 465 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,135
Write 481
Mixed 589
SusWrite 440
146% 661 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 36.8
125% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 546
386% 488 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 131%
Great: 278%
WDC WDS200T1R0B-68A4Z0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 00WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 320 321 326 341 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 382
Write 374
Mixed 285
SusWrite 316
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 36.1
123% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 247
212% 314 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
857GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 113 114 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 112
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 129 133 130 125 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 71.5
Write 88.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 126
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 126 125 126 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 118
Write 94.5
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 124
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-033.A00G Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 22.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 ACR00DB S273HL
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback