Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '23 at 21:09
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2314 26 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 192 64% 116 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 238 29% 224 Pts	64-Core 255 16% 255 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 2TB 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 342 93 38 66 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	114% Outstanding	Read 1,593 Write 219 Mixed 446 SusWrite 152 130% 603 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 20.4 74% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 496 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 294 254% 380 MB/s

Intel Raid 10 Volume 1.5TB 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 342 93 38 66 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	108% Outstanding	Read 1,539 Write 545 Mixed 246 SusWrite 152 134% 621 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 17.1 55% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 501 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 287 258% 392 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2G43BB2-CWE 2x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 33.6 MC Mixed 31.4 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 21 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	7	60	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16