Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X507UAR
Memory	0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190521
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '23 at 17:21
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 40.2 2-Core 89.2 42% 66 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 153 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620 8,599 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1311) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 5.8 4% 4.67 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 4 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S650 480GB 388 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0929A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 77 164 65 120 115 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 55.6 Write 171 Mixed 94.4 SusWrite 116 25% 109 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 9 45% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 42.9 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 33.2 37% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 106%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB 4,156 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3GB free Firmware: SBFK61E1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 38.4 Write 237 Mixed 19.9 22% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 17.4 46% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 16.5 55% 122 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D23.22240H.001 1x8GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.7% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.7 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMN15E6

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

CPU
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples	185x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	122x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	27x

GPU
HD Graphics 620IntelBench 4%, 8,599 samples	185x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	153x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	13x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	23x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	19x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	10x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	83x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	41x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16