Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 17:09
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 338
101% 193 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 910
95% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,390
86% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2731 1368 700 692 702 706 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 3,053
Write 3,138
Mixed 2,220
SusWrite 1,150
536% 2,390 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 79.2
298% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 1,290
DQ Mixed 1,460
1,065% 1,386 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 343%
Great: 435%
Nvme Predator SSD GM3500 1TB
404GB free
Firmware: 42BFU6MG Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 566 530 408 492 535 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 2,210
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 604
344% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 82
285% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,284
DQ Write 1,284
DQ Mixed 687
680% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 244%
This bench: 254%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA095N Crucial CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 53.3
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 24.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 137%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback