Acer Predator PO7-640

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO7-640  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO7-640
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 194
2-Core 394
113% 220 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,504
134% 1,135 Pts
64-Core 2,264
140% 2,264 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Sapphire(174B A613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 301
Parallax 354
253% 322 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 253
Splatting 189
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 211%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1577 2047 2037 2041 1512 857 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1882 3416 3421 3107 1750 1749 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix CG78MEBUA084N 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
143% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 52.4
158% 55.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 26.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 143%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 5R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 36% 39 217 60 100 34" 3440 1440 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
History: Score 44: 0P 3R 9G 2B | Score 34: 0P 5R 3G 0B
Typical Predator PO7-640 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO7-640

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $996
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback