Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220104
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 19:03
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 147
2-Core 282
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,117
100% 846 Pts
64-Core 2178
135% 2178 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8707) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 159
Parallax 159
130% 159 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STES1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,425
Write 2,522
Mixed 641
343% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 61.1
208% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,552
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 1,298
986% 1,337 MB/s
Poor: 136% Great: 371%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
109GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 304 309 309 310 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 448
Mixed 386
SusWrite 324
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 51.9
172% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Intel SSDSC2KG038T8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: XCV10110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 411 414 409 413 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 345
Write 381
Mixed 332
SusWrite 409
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 32.6
110% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 188
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 96%
Intel SSDSC2KG038T8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: XCV10110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 384 384 380 385 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 330
Write 382
Mixed 313
SusWrite 386
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 31.5
110% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 185
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
222GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 117 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 83.8
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
735GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 184 180 180 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 181
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 34.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 32.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G3
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback