Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-6Y30 5,480 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 22.2 2-Core 44 25% 37 Pts	4-Core 73.5 8-Core 71.7 10% 72.6 Pts	64-Core 69 4% 69 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 80FC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 4.5 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB 1,750 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 103 114 101 115 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Write 134 Mixed 151 SusWrite 110 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 12.3 41% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 124 91% 120 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 825629-981 2x2GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 1 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	29	14	60	12"	1280 720	LGD04A5

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	277x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	53x
SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,074 samples	41x
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	23x

RAM
825630-691 2x4GBMicron/ElpidaBench 55%, 428 samples	92x
825630-391 2x4GBHynixBench 55%, 496 samples	76x
825630-991 2x4GBSamsungBench 55%, 372 samples	63x