Olidata ALICON 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOlidata ALICON 4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5K-E
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 02 '18 at 10:35
Run Duration556 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8300
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 78
40% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 77
10% 76.8 Pts
64-Core 78
5% 78 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E247) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.37
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 6.78
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 5
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$80
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 250
Write 200
Mixed 199
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 9.69
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 9.61
14% 26 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 115%
INTENSO 128GB
39GB free
Firmware: S9FM01.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 252
Write 79.8
Mixed 148
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 2.93
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 2.49
6% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 91%
WD WD2000BB-22GUC0 200GB
84GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 46.4
Mixed 37.8
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.37
90% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
24GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 45.5
Mixed 25.4
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.39
86% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 40%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
21GB free
Firmware: 09.01D09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 48.1
Mixed 38.7
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.48
112% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 33%
Maxtor 6 L250R0 251GB
104GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
Read 30
Write 24.7
Mixed 27
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 3.87
4K Mixed 0.27
143% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 27%
TDK LoR TF10 8GB
3GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Read 13.9
Write 2.79
Mixed 3.99
7% 6.91 MB/s
4K Read 4.64
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
18% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALICON 4 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Olidata ALICON 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback