MSI X99S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 03:11
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 142
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 493
47% 387 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.84
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 144
Splatting 144
118% 144 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 114%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 398
Write 356
Mixed 316
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 21.7
76% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 126
114% 179 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
880GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,556
Write 1,102
Mixed 1,152
282% 1,270 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 18.3
75% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 96.9
105% 185 MB/s
Poor: 253% Great: 515%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
931GB free
Firmware: CS900615
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 183
Write 107
Mixed 234
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 14.9
63% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 94.3
93% 155 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 102%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
432GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 67.6
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 156
Mixed 97.1
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 98%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
73GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.1
Write 9.2
Mixed 7.7
16% 16 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 20.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 27 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27A8 ASUS MG278
Typical X99S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback