Asrock B450M/ac R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 00:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 204
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 803
72% 608 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 137
Parallax 178
140% 162 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
120% 153 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1139 836 836 840 838 840 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,986
Write 1,893
Mixed 1,644
SusWrite 888
360% 1,603 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 44.8
145% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 336
247% 326 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 193%
Great: 288%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
3GB free
Firmware: CS900BB3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 380
Write 160
Mixed 327
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 32.4
112% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 205
165% 230 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 91%
Adata SD600 512GB
240GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 385 385 390 391 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 394
Write 390
Mixed 379
SusWrite 387
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 24.7
82% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 144
111% 152 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-120.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 36.2
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 32.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 30 165 27" 1280 720 HPN3810 HX Armada 27
Typical B450M/ac R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback