Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$184
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 237
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 745
71% 589 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.2
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 61.1
49% 62.7 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 59.9
49% 60.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 310 309 311 313 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 454
Write 308
Mixed 298
SusWrite 311
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 29.6
113% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 239
205% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105
1TB free
Firmware: 1AN10003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 89 90 91 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 73.8
Write 74.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 88.5
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-2G3A1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 100 31.5" 1920 1017 AOC3201 32G1WG4
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,029
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback