Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A960D+V2 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151125
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 20:19
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 54.1 2-Core 90 49% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 180 21% 164 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 38.8 Parallax 36 28% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 26.4 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$102 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 85 88 90 89 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.2% Average	Read 194 Write 183 Mixed 176 SusWrite 85 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 27.9 90% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 62.6 DQ Mixed 44 35% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 137%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 85 89 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 104 Write 85.9 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 86.4 60% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1600 CL10 Series 16GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	3	195	19	60	27"	1920 1017	HWP3325 HP 27es

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	26x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	18x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	14x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	13x

SSD
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	3x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	35x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	11x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16