Lenovo 30A6S0AC05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30A6S0AC05  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory120.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 17:42
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 632
61% 503 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
HP(103C 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 128
Parallax 116
92% 119 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 109
99% 124 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 319 322 320 322 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,192
Mixed 739
SusWrite 348
224% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 54.4
172% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 677
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 571
411% 537 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 170%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$145
912GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2000 2093 1267 1156 1171 1167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,313
Write 2,145
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,476
422% 1,881 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 58.3
187% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 721
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 618
442% 574 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 266%
Great: 372%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 197 199 201 200 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 195
Mixed 105
SusWrite 199
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.1
347% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 111%
Great: 129%
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 1TB-$51
931GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 193 193 195 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 187
Mixed 121
SusWrite 195
131% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.7
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF Micron 18ASF2G72P... 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 42.2
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 20.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27.9" 1280 720 ACR0907 XV282K KV
Typical 30A6S0AC05 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30A6S0AC05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback