F-plus FLAPTOP i

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemF-plus FLAPTOP i  (all builds)
MotherboardF-Plus f+ FLAPTOP I-SERIES
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 16:51
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 48
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 189
58% 109 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 484
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 10.9
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 11.7
9% 12.4 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 12.8
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F256G 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1017 1003 955 1068 984 342 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,139
Mixed 936
SusWrite 895
242% 1,077 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 32.8
107% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 482
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 95.2
168% 331 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 162%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200C8GZH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 4 60 15.5" 1280 720 HKC3D05
Typical FLAPTOP i Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: F-plus FLAPTOP i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback