Kubevirt None

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Kubevirt None (all builds)
Motherboard	Red RHEL-AV
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 16:45
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core 13 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 57.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 66% 123 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 643 64% 522 Pts	64-Core 749 46% 749 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3713 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.2% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 122 Parallax 116 89% 116 fps	MRender 160 Gravity 105 Splatting 114 102% 126 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 102%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 100GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,752 Write 2,475 Mixed 2,222 553% 2,483 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 47.5 147% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 177 147% 214 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Red Hat 1x16GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 37 97% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 27 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	33	60	22.6"	1280 720	LNX0000 Linux FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical None Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Kubevirt None

CPU
Core (Broadwell, IBRS)IntelBench 52%, 27 samples	1x
Xeon (Icelake)IntelBench 69%, 18 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1x
A2NvidiaBench 34%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat 100GBRedBench 106%, 5 samples	1x
Hat 4x16GBRedBench 91%, 50 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Kubevirt None

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Kubevirt None

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)