MSI PRO H610M-E (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-E (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230713
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100F-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 180
2-Core 325
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 840
88% 705 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.4% Average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 71.4
40% 60.2 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 44.4
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(s) 1024G 1TB
773GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 402 409 430 433 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 339
Write 403
Mixed 110
SusWrite 377
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 31
115% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 166
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81%
Great: 101%
Apacer AS350 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: V0520A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 411 421 443 444 447 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-5200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 51.1
154% 53.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 28.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 140%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 27" 1280 720 LHCFFFF LM27-E231
Typical PRO H610M-E (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-E (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback