Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 12:29
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 597
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 74.7
24% 45.1 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 57
Splatting 42.3
36% 43.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
727GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1620 1635 1658 1701 1691 1692 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,813
Write 1,697
Mixed 1366
SusWrite 1,666
368% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 38.1
161% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 756
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 576
446% 616 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 251%
Great: 352%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
28GB free
Firmware: S5Z42109
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,285
Write 665
Mixed 787
201% 912 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 30.6
125% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 319
242% 327 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
215GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 53.9
Write 46.4
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 45.2
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 101
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC155 PHL 243V7
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback